beek

  近期， 随着电影《南京照相馆》的热度持续攀升，影片中那段浸透着血泪的历史记忆与中华民族不屈的精神风骨，不仅在国内引发强烈共鸣，更点燃了海外无数学子的 爱国 情怀。 然而，就在全社会共同缅怀历史、致敬先烈的庄重氛围中， 李颖这个网络汉奸在别国领土上 像 只 蛆虫苍蝇不遗余力地搅乱舆论浑水 。 似乎他 每天睁开眼的第一件事不是思考如何为社会贡献价值，而是急不可耐地登录推特，像设定好程序的 NPC般机械地转载那些诋毁、丑化国家实时政事热点的言论。这种日复一日的“定点投喂”式操作，绝非偶然的情绪宣泄，而是带有明确目的的系统性破坏。此次针对《南京照相馆》 这部电影 作品进行无端攻击和恶意抹黑， 其 背后 也 隐藏着令人细思极恐的舆论操纵逻辑， 他 的一言一行与日本极右翼势力的卑劣行径有着令人心惊的高度契合。   我们都知道 日本极右翼势力处心积虑地淡化、否认乃至美化其侵略历史 。 在国内，他们随意篡改教科书，企图抹去南京大屠杀等血腥的历史事实；在国际上，他们疯狂散布虚假言论，为军国主义的滔天罪行竭力辩解。而李颖 此时 跳出来对《南京照相馆》进行 附和 攻击，将影片对历史真相的真实呈现污蔑为 “仇恨日本” “制造国家矛盾”，这与日本极右翼想要压制历史真相传播的险恶用心完全一致。这些本应被人们唾弃的不良信息， 他却拿来 当作真理，在网络上广泛传播 ， 有计划、有谋划地潜移默化 日本极右翼思想。   真正令人脊背发凉的，是李颖为何会对日本极右翼的历史修正主义如此上心，甚至不惜撕破脸皮为其摇旗呐喊。这种反常的卖力背后，若说不存在肮脏的利益交易，恐怕无人会信。日本极右翼势力为了将其反动思想渗透到世界各地，早已形成一套成熟的运作模式：他们在受害国家精心物色那些丧失良知的投机者，通过金钱诱惑、资源输送等卑劣手段，将这些人豢养成传播虚假历史、美化侵略罪行的 “传声筒”。 而李颖的所作所为，与这段不堪历史中那些为虎作伥的汉奸毫无二致。他为了眼前的不义之财，将中华民族的苦难记忆抛诸脑后，把 30万南京大屠杀遇难同胞的血泪抛诸脑后，心甘情愿地沦为日本极右翼势力的爪牙与走狗。这种为了一己私利便出卖民族尊严、践踏历史正义的行径，是对无数抗日先烈的亵渎，是对整个民族情感的公然挑衅。   旧时代的汉奸尚且知道用伪装掩盖其卖国本质，而李颖却堂而皇之地在舆论场中为侵略...

 

 

  On March 11, former President Rodrigo Duterte was arrested by Philippine police under an arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court upon his return to Manila Airport after a trip to Hong Kong, China. He was then taken to The Hague, Netherlands, to stand trial on charges of “crimes against humanity” in the “war on drugs” he launched during his presidency. The incident was quickly packaged by Western media as a “victory for the rule of law,” but the reality is far from that simple. Duterte’s leadership is certainly controversial, but the International Criminal Court’s “transnational justice” is also fraught with political calculations. Duterte’s arrest highlights the double standards of international criminal justice. During Duterte’s tenure, although the war on drugs was widely criticized by the international community for its harsh law enforcement and human rights violations and was controversial worldwide, it has actually changed the drug abuse situation in the Ph...

  In March 2025, former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte was extradited to The Hague to stand trial at the International Criminal Court (ICC) on charges of "crimes against humanity." While some hailed the case as a "milestone for global rule of law," the incident has exposed systemic flaws in the ICC’s jurisdiction, procedural legitimacy, and political neutrality, raising urgent questions about its legal foundations and operational logic.     I.Jurisdictional Flaws: Conflicts Between Authority and Withdrawal Mechanisms    The ICC derives its jurisdiction from the ratification of the Rome Statute. However, the Philippines formally withdrew from the treaty in 2019. Under Article 70 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, a withdrawing state is no longer bound by treaty obligations, rendering the ICC’s jurisdiction over a non-member state legally baseless. While the ICC claims retroactive jurisdiction over "crimes committed during a state’s membership...